Emotion vs. analytics : decision making and the biased brain.
(eVideo)
Contributors
Published
[San Francisco, California, USA] : Kanopy Streaming, 2014.
Format
eVideo
Physical Desc
1 online resource (1 video file, approximately 61 min.) : digital, .flv file, sound
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
More Details
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Title from title frames.
Date/Time and Place of Event
Originally produced by Kantola Productions in 2009.
Description
Is it best to be emotionless and analytical in decision making? When our goal is to be decisive, the answer is a resounding no. Instead, harnessing the power of emotions is critical. Studies of the neural underpinnings of decision making show that our brains start by evaluating options analytically. But very soon usually based on first impressions we create an emotional front-runner. We then continue down a path of predecisional distortion, which biases further evaluation. Rather than creating bad decisions, however, this distortion leads to more confident, committed decision making. This natural process works best for tradeoff conflicts: deciding between current options. It also works well for decisions involving innovation, growth and expansion. But in cases of sequential conflicts or when the risk of danger or a bad outcome is greater taking a more analytical approach is the better choice. Dr. Shiv describes specific techniques for gathering data, group decision making, accessing your gut feelings, and knowing when to allow the contrarians to dominate the discussion.
System Details
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Shiv, D. (2014). Emotion vs. analytics: decision making and the biased brain . Kanopy Streaming.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Shiv, Dr.. 2014. Emotion Vs. Analytics: Decision Making and the Biased Brain. Kanopy Streaming.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Shiv, Dr.. Emotion Vs. Analytics: Decision Making and the Biased Brain Kanopy Streaming, 2014.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Shiv, Dr.. Emotion Vs. Analytics: Decision Making and the Biased Brain Kanopy Streaming, 2014.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
c82d8552-0aa9-2eb4-f0de-36ede8b10814-eng
Grouping Information
Grouped Work ID | c82d8552-0aa9-2eb4-f0de-36ede8b10814-eng |
---|---|
Full title | emotion vs analytics decision making and the biased brain |
Author | kanopy |
Grouping Category | movie |
Last Update | 2022-08-24 19:23:17PM |
Last Indexed | 2024-04-17 02:20:14AM |
Book Cover Information
Image Source | sideload |
---|---|
First Loaded | Dec 24, 2023 |
Last Used | Feb 10, 2024 |
Marc Record
First Detected | Jan 28, 2022 10:08:30 AM |
---|---|
Last File Modification Time | Aug 24, 2022 07:23:38 PM |
MARC Record
LEADER | 02408ngm a2200385 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | kan1051590 | ||
003 | CaSfKAN | ||
005 | 20130802105144.0 | ||
006 | m o c | ||
007 | vz uzazuu | ||
007 | cr una---unuuu | ||
008 | 140717p20142009cau060 o vleng d | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a 1051590|b Kanopy |
035 | |a (OCoLC)897766705 | ||
040 | |a UtOrBLW|b eng|c UtOrBLW|e rda | ||
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Emotion vs. analytics :|b decision making and the biased brain. |
264 | 1 | |a [San Francisco, California, USA] :|b Kanopy Streaming,|c 2014. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (1 video file, approximately 61 min.) :|b digital, .flv file, sound | ||
336 | |a two-dimensional moving image|2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer|2 rdamedia | ||
337 | |a video|2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource|2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Title from title frames. | ||
518 | |a Originally produced by Kantola Productions in 2009. | ||
520 | |a Is it best to be emotionless and analytical in decision making? When our goal is to be decisive, the answer is a resounding no. Instead, harnessing the power of emotions is critical. Studies of the neural underpinnings of decision making show that our brains start by evaluating options analytically. But very soon usually based on first impressions we create an emotional front-runner. We then continue down a path of predecisional distortion, which biases further evaluation. Rather than creating bad decisions, however, this distortion leads to more confident, committed decision making. This natural process works best for tradeoff conflicts: deciding between current options. It also works well for decisions involving innovation, growth and expansion. But in cases of sequential conflicts or when the risk of danger or a bad outcome is greater taking a more analytical approach is the better choice. Dr. Shiv describes specific techniques for gathering data, group decision making, accessing your gut feelings, and knowing when to allow the contrarians to dominate the discussion. | ||
538 | |a Mode of access: World Wide Web. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Decision making. | |
650 | 0 | |a Emotions. | |
650 | 0 | |a Business. | |
650 | 0 | |a Group decision making. | |
650 | 0 | |a Instinct. | |
700 | 0 | |a Shiv,|c Dr.,|e speaker. | |
710 | 2 | |a Kanopy (Firm) | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://tamworthlibrary.kanopy.com/node/51591|z A Kanopy streaming video |
856 | 4 | 2 | |z Cover Image|u https://www.kanopy.com/node/51591/external-image |